Talk:Zilwaukee Bridge

Michigan Mid‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Structural refinements in the direction of engineering prose

I'm not really an engineer (tho i studied some engineering) but engineers and physicists enjoy mutual intelligibility, and a real engineer could easily dress up my physics-point-of-view wording, with the more suitable professional eng'r'g terminology; 'tis thus that i reworded what i take as the (however valuable) sidewalk supervisor-ish description. I summarized

Redesigned mumbling description of the technical aspects, relying on my highly analytical insight as a physicist.

Successful physicists rely on engineers, replacing (p.r.n.) the physical description with their own professional (and yet, at least less dweebish) jargon, and we often have no real occasion to learn that other, equally valuable (yet in this --and in perhaps most-- contexts, more germane) set of specialized jargon.
--JerzyA (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]