Talk:Zock Allen
Appearance
Zock Allen has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 1, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Zock Allen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Zock Allen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bcschneider53 (talk · contribs) 21:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Will review. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 21:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Lead
[edit]- Maybe a slight expansion would be useful here?
Professional career
[edit]- "In late August, the Lions moved Allen to the practice squad and replaced him with new signing Bruce Holmes, who had led the CFL in tackles the previous season with the Ottawa Rough Riders.[4][6][7] Allen finished his rookie season with 31 tackles, two sacks, and a fumble recovery over six games played.[8]" So it appears he was called up from the practice squad at some point...when exactly was that?
- @Bcschneider53: I don't believe they did, actually. Keep in mind the CFL season starts substantially earlier than the NFL in early July, so a move in late August is already 6-8 weeks into the season (depending on exact start date/move time). The sources aren't 100% clear on this (and often don't include information on healthy scratches where a player is on the active roster but designated not to play in a game), but I think the six games were all before his move to the practice squad. ~ Rob13Talk 05:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- "He was quickly brought back to the active roster, though, and recorded five tackles in the Lions' season-opening win against the Toronto Argonauts.[13]" Suggested rewrite: "Despite this, he was quickly brought back to the active roster and recorded five tackles in the Lions' season-opening win against the Toronto Argonauts.[13]"
- I'm not a fan of "Despite this" when not clearly warranted, because it adds a bit of an editorial spin on things (e.g. suddenly a routine move to the practice squad for a marginal player sounds like a major career setback). How about just dropping the "though" bit? I agree it makes things sound kind of awkward. I tried that out in the article but welcome additional feedback on this sentence. ~ Rob13Talk 05:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Dropping the though works for me :) --Bcschneider53 (talk) 11:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not a fan of "Despite this" when not clearly warranted, because it adds a bit of an editorial spin on things (e.g. suddenly a routine move to the practice squad for a marginal player sounds like a major career setback). How about just dropping the "though" bit? I agree it makes things sound kind of awkward. I tried that out in the article but welcome additional feedback on this sentence. ~ Rob13Talk 05:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Not much as usual. Assuming good faith as all the sources are offline. Placing on hold. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 21:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'll tackle the lead tomorrow. Not sure how much can be expanded, but I'll try to squeeze out another sentence or two. In case you're wondering where I'm accessing the offline sources or if you have access to this database, I use LexisNexis Academic almost exclusively. They have a great collection of Canadian newspapers. ~ Rob13Talk 05:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- That's great. I'm sure it's been a valuable resource for you! --Bcschneider53 (talk) 11:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- I added some info on his college career. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- @WikiOriginal-9 and BU Rob13: Well done. Passing for GA. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 13:56, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Canadian football articles
- Low-importance Canadian football articles
- WikiProject Canadian football articles
- GA-Class college football articles
- Bottom-importance college football articles
- WikiProject College football articles