Jump to content

Talk:Zodiac Mindwarp and the Love Reaction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Is this about Zodiac mindwarp as mark mannings alter-ego? about zodiac mindwarp and the love reaction as a band? or about mark manning? also were the collaborations mentioned the band or just mark manning? beyond that since mark manning is also an author shouldn't he have his own page mentioning his work with this band as well as his career as a cartoonist and author? I don't have a problem wikifying this page but I need to know what the original intent was. Syzergy 23:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just wikified what was provided. If the original author has a problem with it, I'm sure they'll revert/edit/complain. JubalHarshaw 19:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Mark Manning should have his own page. This page should only be about Zodiac the character and Zodiac the band. After all, there are separate pages for Ali G and Sasha Baron Cohen which is comparable (real person and their famous character). I would make the page now, but I think there needs to be a fair bit of info in it from the start or one of the must-merge-everything editors will just revert it. - Drstuey 01:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm generally of the "merge it" school, but I think in this case your point is probably good. Zodiac Mindwarp and The Love Reaction isn't the same as Mark Manning, author, hellraiser and rock star. If such an effort could work on Bad Wisdom at the same time that would of course be a great bonus for WP:KLF. Off to work mate! --kingboyk 13:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC) P.S. The article on Jimmy Cauty claims that he was a short-lived member of the Love Reaction. Is that true and if so do you know of any sources?[reply]

POV

[edit]

I added the {POV} tag. The article is short of references, but big on personal opinions. A stern edit including Wikipedia:Verifiability could be a starting point here. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]