Jump to content

Technobiophilia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Technobiophilia is the innate tendency to focus on life and lifelike processes as they appear in technology.[1] The concept was invented by Sue Thomas as an analysis of the Biophilia hypothesis introduced by the biologist Edward O. Wilson in his book Biophilia (1984).

Definitions

[edit]

Wilson defines biophilia as "the innate tendency to focus on life and lifelike processes."[2]

Technobiophilia in practice may connect human life and digital processes with nature, contribute to well-being via a tech-nature balance, and support future biodiversity as technology and nature move closer together.

Timothy Beatley, Professor of Sustainable Communities in the Department of Urban and Environmental Planning at the University of Virginia School of Architecture, has written of technobiophilia, "We can look forward to the promise and potential of technophilic cities, that at once commit to restoring and enjoying actual nature, but acknowledge the realities of life in cities (much of it inside, and behind a screen), and the powerful ways in which our digital technologies could underpin and help to reinforce our nature-ful commitments and experiences and our biophilic tendencies."[3]

Relationship with Indigenous Communities

[edit]

The understanding of human-nature relationships in Indigenous communities has contributed to the field of technobiophilia. Indigenous knowledge systems often emphasize the interconnectedness of nature with humanity, recognizing the importance of maintaining harmony with our environment. Several cultural foundational principles actively participate in the discussion and creation of technophilic technologies and practices.

The knowledge accumulated over generations about local ecosystems, biodiversity, and sustainable resource management guides modern approaches to nature-human interactions while informing new technological innovations in sustainable practices. Foundational principles for TEK offer valuable insights into the field of technobiophilia, including a deep understanding of local ecosystems, biodiversity conservation, and respect for natural cycles. By integrating Indigenous knowledge of species interconnections and ecological processes, developers can create systems that mimic the resilience and adaptability of natural ecosystems, leading to more sustainable and environmentally respectful solutions.[4]

Indigenous spiritual and cultural perspectives often emphasize the sacredness of nature and the interconnectedness of all living beings.[5] These perspectives can inform technobiophilic practices by integrating respect for the natural world into technological design and usage. For example, incorporating symbols or patterns that are meaningful to Indigenous cultures into technology interfaces can create a sense of connection and respect for cultural traditions. Additionally, technology can be used to support spiritual practices, such as virtual ceremonies or online platforms for sharing spiritual teachings.

Traditional Practices and Technologies

[edit]

Indigenous traditional practices and technologies are often deeply rooted in an understanding of local ecosystems and sustainable living.[6] These practices can offer valuable insights for developing technobiophilic technologies that are in harmony with the environment. For example, traditional architectural techniques that use natural materials and are adapted to local climate conditions can inspire eco-friendly and sustainable building designs in modern technology.

Language and storytelling are central to Indigenous cultures, serving as a means of passing down knowledge, values, and traditions.[7] In the context of technobiophilia, technology can be used to preserve and revitalize Indigenous languages and storytelling traditions. For example, digital platforms can provide spaces for sharing stories, recording languages, and facilitating intergenerational learning. Additionally, storytelling can be incorporated into technology design, such as using narratives to guide user experiences or creating virtual reality experiences that immerse users in Indigenous stories.

Technology offers an opportunity for Indigenous people to uphold and practice their connection with the land, even in our industrialized world. By integrating traditional knowledge and values into technological solutions, Indigenous communities can maintain their cultural heritage while addressing contemporary challenges. However, it is crucial to approach this integration with ethical sensitivity, especially when dealing with practices that are sacred and private to Indigenous cultures. [8]

The importance of human-centered design in technobiophilia cannot be overstated. Involving and incorporating Indigenous people in the development of technobiophilic technologies ensures that these solutions are truly reflective of their needs, values, and perspectives. This participatory approach fosters mutual respect and understanding and can lead to more sustainable and culturally appropriate outcomes.[9]

Community-Led Initiatives

[edit]

A Canadian Indigenous organization and website that provides an interactive map depicting Indigenous territories, languages, and treaties around the world. The platform allows users to enter their location and discover the Indigenous territories they reside upon while providing information about the Native communities who historically and currently inhabit these lands.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Thomas, Sue (2013). Technobiophilia: nature and cyberspace. London: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1849660396.
  2. ^ Wilson, Edward O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-07442-4.
  3. ^ Beatley, Timothy (2015). "The Technobiophilic City".
  4. ^ “Indigenous Peoples and Technobiophilia: Perspectives on the Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Nature-Based Technology Design” by Sian Lindsey, Christos Lynteris, et al. (2018)
  5. ^ "Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence | Request PDF".
  6. ^ "Coming to Understanding: Developing Conservation through Incremental Learning in the Pacific Northwest".
  7. ^ https://nimshav.github.io/EthnoComm-Repository/EOC_Library/Basso%20-%201996%20-%20Wisdom%20sits%20in%20places.pdf
  8. ^ https://nycstandswithstandingrock.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/linda-tuhiwai-smith-decolonizing-methodologies-research-and-indigenous-peoples.pdf
  9. ^ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236748414_Indigenous_Knowledge_and_Technology_Creating_Environmental_Justice_in_the_Twenty-First_Century
[edit]