Template:Did you know nominations/1
Appearance
DYK toolbox |
---|
1
- ... that 1 is its own square, square root, and factorial?
- Source: *Colman, Samuel (1912). Coan, C. Arthur (ed.). Nature's Harmonic Unity: A Treatise on Its Relation to Proportional Form. New York and London: G.P. Putnam's Sons. pp. 9–10.
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Polyamorph (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Polyamorph (talk) 12:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC).
- Congratulations on the Good Article status! This article is newly promoted to Good Article, and is sufficiently long and well cited. The Copyvio pulls up a flag to an obscure pdf, which must be an example of the reverse (pdf using text from wikipedia). The hook is excellent, terse and to the point but a tease that draw the readers in; if only to marvel at how you can write an encyclopedia entry on '1'. Hook source checks out. QPQ not required for the nominator. Approved! Chaiten1 (talk) 13:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Polyamorph and Chaiten1: What is your opinion of the hook ALT1: ... that many older typewriters do not have a dedicated key for the numeral 1?--Launchballer 14:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I prefer my proposed hook as its a fundamental property of the number itself. Polyamorph (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- No worries then.--Launchballer 15:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Polyamorph and Launchballer, sorry for disrupting. But apparently, is it possible we add some wiklinks about those three? To me, readers may not understand about mathematical terms. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 23:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Factorial maybe, although square and square root are surely common terms.--Launchballer 23:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I did consider wikilinks, the issue is that the wikilink 1 is small, even when bolded. I wanted to make sure that users focus was on the link to 1 and not some other non-GA article. But I would support a wikilink to factorial (which is a GA), and indeed square (algebra) and square root if these would be helpful. Polyamorph (talk) 05:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Factorial maybe, although square and square root are surely common terms.--Launchballer 23:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Polyamorph and Launchballer, sorry for disrupting. But apparently, is it possible we add some wiklinks about those three? To me, readers may not understand about mathematical terms. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 23:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- No worries then.--Launchballer 15:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I prefer my proposed hook as its a fundamental property of the number itself. Polyamorph (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Polyamorph and Chaiten1: What is your opinion of the hook ALT1: ... that many older typewriters do not have a dedicated key for the numeral 1?--Launchballer 14:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)