Template:Did you know nominations/129 (barge)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 04:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

129 (barge)

129 c. 1895
129 c. 1895

Created by GreatLakesShips (talk). Self-nominated at 23:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC).

  • New and long enough, well cited, no other policy issues. Hook is within length and interesting. I think the bold link is hard to see since it is just three numbers. I propose using a longer name as in ALT2 just to make it stand out. Photo is not that sharp, so probably not suitable for DYK image slot, but OK to use license-wise (in PD). QPQ done. Good to go with ALT2. MB 02:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  • ALT2... that Barge 129 (pictured) was sunk on Lake Superior by the ship that was towing her? 0129
  • New reviewer needed for ALT2, since a new fact (Lake Superior) has been added by the reviewer when creating it. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • The new ALT2 hook checks out to the source and is interesting. The rest of the review stands per MB. Agree that a longer hook bold might make more sense to highlight that the numbers are the name of the vessel. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)