Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/1966 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Championship Game

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

1966 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Championship Game

[edit]

Created by Giants2008 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC).


  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 00:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 12262 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (19.4% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 21:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Please note that I tweaked the blurb, so the character count the bot is showing will be incorrect. It should still be under 200 characters, if I'm counting correctly. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Giants2008, I'm afraid that the changed hook comes in at 201 characters, which is too long. I'd recommend avoiding the repetition of all or part of "NCAA Men's Division I Basketball" in the hook, which would also solve the length problem. One possibility, which comes in at 168 characters:
If you'd prefer a different wording, please provide it as an ALT2; do not change ALT1 or the initial overlong hook. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
The new wording seems fine to me. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:02, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review needed now that hook is set. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Confirming the bot assessment of satisfactory newness, length, referencing, lack of copyright problems, maintenance tag free. Correct person is credited. Hook ALT1 is 168 chars, short enough. QPQ OK Hook ALT1 is in the article, referenced and confirmed by citation. Good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:16, 25 October 2016 (UTC)