Template:Did you know nominations/1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis

Improved to Good Article status by AdoTang (talk). Self-nominated at 19:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

  • Adequate sourcing: Yes
  • Neutral: Yes
  • Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: No - The Earwig result shows 43.8% similarity. Most of it is quotes but there are some instances of close paraphrasing. A few instances are:
    • "The killings occurred... had seemingly turned away from the Nation of Islam"
    • "The NYPD's 90th Precinct... by a silent alarm and a Bushwick High School student who managed to escape"
    • "... a typist had incorrectly described one of the weapons"
I would check Earwig and the sources and try to make sure that everything has been put into your own words.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: If you can just resolve the close paraphrasing issues above, I'm happy to pass this review. Sammielh (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

  • @Sammielh: Reworded these lines and a few others. Earwig now says 39.4% for the Bushwick Daily source as of typing this, and almost all of the flags are for quotes. AdoTang (talk) 00:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
    • @AdoTang: Thank you for rewording. I've taken another look and it is now almost entirely quotes and names being picked up by earwig. The source for ALT2 doesn't specifically say that Schlossberg was one of the people considering that approach but I'm happy to approve any of the other hooks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammielh (talkcontribs)