The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Aoidh (talk) 21:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
... that the text of the Acts of Peter and the Twelve were completely unknown until there discovery at Nag Hammadi in 1945? Source: Schenke, Hans-Martin (2003). New Testament Apocrypha: Writings relating to the Apostles; Apocalypses and related subjects. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 412–425. ISBN 978-0-664-22722-7. Retrieved 1 March 2023. Pages 412-413 , https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations/AAI9719094/
ALT1: ... that some scholars debate whether the Acts of Peter and the Twelve is gnostic as although the text lacks explicitly Gnostic views, its themes could be interpreted as Gnostic? Source: Schenke, Hans-Martin (2003). New Testament Apocrypha: Writings relating to the Apostles; Apocalypses and related subjects. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 412–425. ISBN 978-0-664-22722-7. Pages 415-416 , Parrott, Douglas M.; Wilson, R. McL. (1981). The Nag Hammadi library in English. San Francisco: Harper & Row. pp. 265–270. ISBN 9780060669294
(The corresponding sources would be 3:10–13 and 8:14–20 of the text itself.)
Also, should the "Acts of Peter and the Twelve" be italicized? It's italicized in the article, so I think we should also italicized it in ALT0 and ALT1. --TheLonelyPather (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)