Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Aerial suspension (illusion)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Aerial suspension (illusion)

[edit]

Early 19th century performance of aerial suspension illusion in India

Created by Storye book (talk). Self nominated at 19:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC).

  • Update: reference 9 which was tagged with "page needed" template has now been replaced with a different online reference. Storye book (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Hi, I'll start reviewing this one. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Article length good, hook length good, hook is interesting, sources for the hook are good, creation date good, no sign of copyvio or close paraphrasing.

Images: The main image is fine. I'm not so sure about File:Robert Houdin Ethereal Suspension.jpg, which needs information about first publication, authorship or something, to show that it's free.

Some sourcing issues that I think need to be fixed:

  • This ref seems to be from the EB 1911 so that should be cited.
  • Magicpedia is a wiki that anyone can edit so that shouldn't be used as a source.
  • AllAboutMagicians.com says that it takes its information from Magicpedia, Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia of Magic and Magicians. The third one sounds okay, so that should be used as a source instead.
  • Not clear what www.pcsorcarmagician.com is.

SlimVirgin (talk) 02:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Thank you for the heads up on these. I'm hoping to get this sorted out in the next day or so. Storye book (talk) 09:47, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
  • I believe I have now corrected all of the above. I've done each correction in a separate summarised edit, in the same order as above, to make it easy for you to check. Any more problems, please let me know.Storye book (talk) 13:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)