Template:Did you know nominations/Alita: Battle Angel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by North America1000 01:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Alita: Battle Angel[edit]

Converted from a redirect by G S Palmer (talk). Self-nominated at 13:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC).

The histmerge was done yesterday, so the timeline shouldn't affect the nomination. I am no longer watching this page—ping if you'd like a response czar 15:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
@Czar: I know, I was just worried that someone might look at the history, say "this goes back to last October!", and fail the nom. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 16:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
I meant it for the same reasons ;) czar 16:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough and long enough. I have struck ALT2 because I am unconvinced with the T&A argument as being the reason for the projected film title. ALT0 and ALT1 are OK and have inline citations. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)