Template:Did you know nominations/Anti male-guardianship campaign
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
anti male-guardianship campaign[edit]
- ... that Saudi women are organising an anti male-guardianship campaign? Source: "All of those arrested are vocal campaigners against Saudi Arabia's male guardianship system, in which male relatives or husbands have control over almost all aspects of women's lives." The Guardian; "Despite having a valid passport, Saudi authorities at the border sent al-Huwaider home. That's because in Saudi Arabia, a woman needs permission from her male guardian before she can leave the country. ... She's urging all Saudi women who are tired of 'being oppressed' to go 'to any border and try to cross it without permission from their male relative.'" CNN
- Reviewed: Leptinella filiformis
Created/expanded by Boud (talk). Self-nominated at 21:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC).
Article long enough, created within the last week, hook is cited in it, well-referenced with reliable sources. Hook looks fine, although I've taken the liberty of linking Saudi; that seems reasonable, given the usage of wikilinking in other hooks I'm seeing. QPQ done. Looks good to go to me. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 22:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
