Template:Did you know nominations/Appian Way Productions
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 23:48, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Appian Way Productions[edit]
- ... that Appian Way Productions has produced The Aviator (2004) and The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), both of which were nominated for the Academy Award for Best Picture?
- Reviewed: Magical Pet
Improved to Good Article status by FrB.TG (talk). Self-nominated at 19:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC).
Satisfies newness requirement, having passed GA assessment on 21 December. The hook is referenced and interesting. QPQ has been met, so I think this is ready to go. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
@Athomeinkobe: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. You have not mentioned article length, neutrality, or close paraphrasing checks. Yoninah (talk) 14:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yoninah, my understanding was that having passed GA review was evidence that those three criteria were met. I confirm that I have checked and they are satisfied. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 22:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well, our experience has shown that GA is not DYK, and we often find close paraphrasing in GA articles. (Sometimes we even submit them for reassessment.) Thank you for confirming those extra checks. Restoring your approval tick. Yoninah (talk) 23:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yoninah, my understanding was that having passed GA review was evidence that those three criteria were met. I confirm that I have checked and they are satisfied. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 22:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
