Template:Did you know nominations/Assisted migration of forests in North America
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 05:53, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Assisted migration of forests in North America
- ... that guidelines for the assisted migration of forests in North America were created because Canadian policymakers feared that foresters would pursue an unregulated assisted migration strategy? Source: "proponents of AM argue for a measured and cautious deployment of the practice, in part because [...] of the risk that AM be implemented by private actors."(Klenk. 2015)
- ALT1: ... that the Torreya Guardians contributed to the assisted migration of forests in North America by relocating the torreya taxifolia outside its native range? Source: "Torreya Guardians turn to assisted migration to help Florida torreyas keep pace with a warming climate" [1]
- ALT2: ... that as part of the ongoing assisted migration of forests in North America, the western larch were selected for reforestation projects nearly 1,000 kilometers north of its native range? Source: "Meanwhile in BC, where 200 million trees are planted in the province every year, the upper range limit has already been extended by up to 400 km in some cases to allow the steady northward march of large populations—and in the case of the larch, an unprecedented thousand kilometer leap." [2]
Improved to Good Article status by Mottezen (talk) and Cbarlow (talk). Nominated by Mottezen (talk) at 22:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC).
Wow, an interesting article on a topic I knew nothing about. Recent GA, it is well written and well referenced. The hooks are from the article, and appropriately referenced. Personally I think ALT2 is the more interesting one. QPQ is not needed. @Mottezen: If ALT2 is selected, the DYK might be accompanied by a picture and be eligible as the top hook. Otherwise this appears to be good to go. Constantine ✍ 19:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I like this high-quality picture of the western larch:
Larix occidentalis
- Thank you. I like this high-quality picture of the western larch:
- Mottezen (talk) 23:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Mottezen: the picture has to be used in the article. How about File:Larix occidentalis 5.jpg? Constantine ✍ 14:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yea that works. Mottezen (talk) 21:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Great, then good to go with ALT3: ... that as part of the ongoing assisted migration of forests in North America, the western larch (pictured) were selected for reforestation projects nearly 1,000 kilometers north of its native range?
- Mottezen (talk) 23:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
