Template:Did you know nominations/Bally's Chicago
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bally's Chicago
- ... that Bally's Chicago, a proposed casino resort in Chicago, has a goal of bringing in $200 million in annual tax revenue to fund the city's police and firefighter pension fund? Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/chicago-casino-proposals-mayor-lori-lightfoot-ballys-hard-rock-rivers-rush-street-gaming/
Created by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- n
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
A QPQ is not needed. There are significant copyright violations. SL93 (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- @SL93: Thank you for your feedback as it has helped me a lot. I've fixed the article, how does it look? TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 18:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- TDKR Chicago 101 There are still copyright violations - "$1.62 billion proposal from Rush Street Gaming", "be built on vacant land between the South Loop and Chinatown along the Chicago River", "the Chicago Tribune printing plant and newsroom near Chicago Avenue and Halsted Street", and more. SL93 (talk) 23:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- SL93, it looks like those particular copyvios may have been addressed right after your post (don't know whether close paraphrasing would still be an issue); should I ask Nikkimaria to do an overall check for lingering issues in that department? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset That would be great. SL93 (talk) 19:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't have full-text access to all sources; of the ones that I do, I don't see anything too concerning. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
