Template:Did you know nominations/Bandola (horse)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by valereee (talk) 12:38, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Bandola (horse)[edit]

  • Reviewed: Foulden Maar

Created by Horsegeek (talk). Self-nominated at 19:52, 19 May 2019 (UTC).

  • Comment Source is the same for all hooks Horsegeek(talk) 20:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  • New enough. User:Horsegeek: Could you please add more categories?Zigzig20s (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Long enough. Neutral, well-sourced, no copyright violation detected.
  • The hook should be ALT1. It is short enough, interesting to a broad audience, and cited.
  • Good to go. More categories would be preferable, however.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Zigzig20s, thank you. I have added more categories. Horsegeek(talk) 17:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Came to promote, but I'm wondering about the term "sire of significance." We don't have an article on it. Is it a common term in horsebreeding? I assume it's used to mean 'sire of many winners' or something like that? The term is used once in the article but doesn't have a source. --valereee (talk) 13:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
  • valereee, doing ALT1 would probably make more sense to the majority, but “sire of significance” is a common horse term that means exactly what it sounds like. It is a sire of great importance, or like you said, of many winners. Horsegeek(talk) 00:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Horsegeek
Thanks, Horsegeek! Given that someone is likely to come along and ask "where is hook source support for calling him a sire of significance?" <g> I suspect we're better off using ALT1, as you say. Hm, but now I'm looking for the sourcing on "Queen of Poland," which is mentioned in the lead without a citation and isn't mentioned again in the article? --valereee (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)--valereee (talk) 09:24, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
valereee, sorry about that! I put the source in next to the place in the article. Horsegeek(talk) 17:11, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Horsegeek