Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of La Haye-du-Puits

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 16:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Battle of La Haye-du-Puits

Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 05:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Battle of La Haye-du-Puits; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Hawkeye7, as the emergency backlog mode is active and you have nominated more than 20 articles, you will need to provide a second QPQ. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Never heard of it, and the software did not mention it. I have added a second review. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
  • This article is not WP:DYKNEW enough. I see that it is currently nominated for GAN, so if that nomination is successful, then this article will be eligible for DYK for 7 days after that nomination is successfully concluded. Dugan Murphy (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
    What are you talking about? The article was moved to the mainspace on 10 March, the day before it was nominated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
According to the article's edit history, it was created in June of 2021. What am I missing? Dugan Murphy (talk) 03:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
That it was created in the userspace and moved to the mainspace on 10 March 2024. [2] WP:DYKNEW: For DYK purposes, an article is considered new if, within the last seven days, the article has been created in mainspace from a redlink or redirect; expanded at least fivefold in terms of its prose portion; promoted to good article status; moved from userspace or draftspace into mainspace;
Ah, thank you for making that clear. I didn't realize an article moved from userspace to mainspace would show its userspace edit history. Since it is now clear to me that the article is new enough, I will complete this nomination review shortly. Dugan Murphy (talk) 14:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: This doesn't hold back the nomination, but I couldn't access Ruppenthal 1951 with the link provided in the sources. I recommend you check on that. Dugan Murphy (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)