Template:Did you know nominations/Beats of Rage (film)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Beats of Rage (film)
[edit]- ... that it took two campaigns to raise the funds for Beats of Rage? Sources: (First and second campaigns)
- ALT1:... that Beats of Rage, a sequel to 2011's The FP, is set to come out seven years after the original?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Corinne Foxx
Created by Sock (talk). Self-nominated at 16:11, 8 May 2018 (UTC).
This article is new enough and long enough. Both the hooks look alright and the article is neutral. However I was at first puzzled by the Earwig copyvio check which comes out as a 61% likelihood of copyright infringement. However I find that the paragraph concerned is copied from the article The FP and you should provide attribution for that. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Sorry for the delay, just realized I didn't have this on my watchlist. I'm a little uncertain as to how best to attribute the work on The FP article, since I wrote all of that information myself as well. How would you suggest I go about it? Sock (
tocktalk) 16:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Sock: If the original text is yours, or largely yours, it probably does not matter, but I think the normal advice is to use an edit summary in the form "Adding material copied from the article The FP, for attribution see that article." I was puzzled because your article was new, and the high Earwig rating was because other sites had copied The FP (which they had had plenty of time to do) and not your new article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Cmwhiraeth: Got it. I traditionally attribute it when the work is not my own but it completely slipped my mind. I'll definitely remember to do that for future articles. Thank you! Sock (
tocktalk) 17:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Cmwhiraeth: Got it. I traditionally attribute it when the work is not my own but it completely slipped my mind. I'll definitely remember to do that for future articles. Thank you! Sock (
- @Cwmhiraeth: Sorry for the delay, just realized I didn't have this on my watchlist. I'm a little uncertain as to how best to attribute the work on The FP article, since I wrote all of that information myself as well. How would you suggest I go about it? Sock (
This article is good to go with either hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
