Template:Did you know nominations/Beelzebub's tube-nosed bat, Ashy-gray tube-nosed bat, Walston's tube-nosed bat

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:43, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Beelzebub's tube-nosed bat, Ashy-gray tube-nosed bat, Walston's tube-nosed bat[edit]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

... that three new species of tube-nosed bats from Southeast Asia were identified in 2011: the Beelzebub's, Ashy-gray (pictured), and Walston's?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Tompkins Corners United Methodist Church, Template:Did you know nominations/Constitutional history of Tokelau, Template:Did you know nominations/Chachi people

Created by PumpkinSky (talk). Self nominated at 00:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC).

Very small nitpicks (although overall the articles look quite good): you seem to be confusing the work= and publisher= parameters; i.e. Wired is a work, not a publisher. Also, what makes Monga Bay and Wildlife Extra News reliable? Species are inherently notable, so citing to the original journal article should be fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:47, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Fixed Wired, and cut the two refs, to make life simple for us all hehe. OTRS now processed on all photos too.PumpkinSky talk 01:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

That was just an example, there are a couple others (National Geographic, Telegraph, Live Science) which need to be in the "work" parameter. However, that's not a DYK criteria so this should be good to go (although it would be nice to clean that up) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Just cleaned it up. PumpkinSky talk 01:27, 2 July 2013 (UTC)