Template:Did you know nominations/Biblioteca Gabriel García Márquez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Biblioteca Gabriel García Márquez

Biblioteca Gabriel García Márquez
Biblioteca Gabriel García Márquez

Created by Kippelboy (talk) and Victuallers (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 17:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Biblioteca Gabriel García Márquez; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good to go. Interesting article. Ergo Sum 04:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

@Kippelboy and Ergo Sum: The claim needs attribution WP:DYKHOOKCITE because we cannot say it in our voice. Lightburst (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
alt1 Victuallers (talk) 22:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
@Victuallers: I meant we have to attribute the quote so that it is not in our voice. Lightburst (talk) 23:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
@Lightburst: I understand that, but in my mind using quotes shows "that it is not in our voice", as it does in the normal use of quote marks. Can you suggest an alt that is in line with your understanding of what is required? Victuallers (talk) 07:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
@Victuallers and Kippelboy: I mean calling it the best in the world is subjective. So we cannot say it as a fact. It needs to be attributed to who made this statement. Maybe something like this:
Someone else will need to promote if you both approve of the hook I suggested. Lightburst (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks I didnt realise that we had to be so explicitly explicit that when we "quote someone" we actually mean that someone else said it and because we are Wikipedia we have to prove it so we have to name them. I know you don't make up this stuff. Thx for the help. ALT1 anf alt2 are not so snappy but I suppose that that the point. both OK by me. Victuallers (talk) 21:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)