Template:Did you know nominations/Borsig Palace

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Borsig Palace

(

)

... that Borsig Palace (pictured), the German Vice-Chancellor's official residence and offices in Berlin, became the new headquarters of Hitler's Storm Troopers (SA) after the "Night of the Long Knives" in 1934?

Prose size, picture license, hook size and creation date OK. For the offline references, AGF. I miss only the hook reference...Alex2006 (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Created/expanded by Ultracobalt (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 04:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Apparently the author was not notified on of the issues. I just notified them tonight and the nom the other day. --Ishtar456 (talk) 23:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Apparently the author was notified indeed on his talk page. Maybe was he sleeping? :-) Alex2006 (talk) 05:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Too bad, seems like and easy fix.--Ishtar456 (talk) 08:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Very easy, about thirty seconds, but it is required by the DYK rules. :-( Alex2006 (talk) 08:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

unresolved for 12 days.--Ishtar456 (talk) 08:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Can we keep the orange cross away till "Articles created/expanded on March 5" nears the top of T:TDYK, please? --PFHLai (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't understand, it is near the top, or at least where the top should be. It has been 12 days since the author was notified. Are we making a special exception in this case? If so, why? How often do the people who have tried to pass it supposed to revisit it to see if it has been cared for? I just don't understand your reasoning.--Ishtar456 (talk) 23:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

I'll take a look. Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:42, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay, see I'd take the last sentence of the para ending in FN 6 as linking to to the hook, but I've added FN 2 to another bit. Just noted the vice-chancellor's bit. Will see what I can do. Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:49, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

this supports the hook. Nothing else online has the 1933 bit where it becomes vice chancellor's offices. Based on this, I'd AGF on the offline sources that they cite the few preceding sentences and go with the hook. Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok, AGF on your AGF. :-) Thanks, also because it is a very nice article, would have been a pity to exclude it from DYK because of that. Alex2006 (talk) 08:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)