Template:Did you know nominations/Buffy pipit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Buffy pipit[edit]

(

)

... that the buffy pipit is often confused with the plain-backed pipit because both birds have plain upperparts? Source: "Field identification of the larger pipits is extremely difficult and all species are frequently confused, especially the sibling species with plain upperparts: the Plainbacked A. leucophrys and Buffy Pipits." [1]
- ALT1:... that the buffy pipit is difficult to distinguish from the plain-backed pipit because both birds have plain upperparts? Source: same source

Reviewed: Diploastrea heliopora

5x expanded by Gulumeemee (talk). Self-nominated at 04:06, 19 December 2016 (UTC).

written neutrally, expanded enough, big enough, no copyvio detected, sourced, hook true to source, review done, good to go. (NB: either hook is ok really) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

If you want more than a handful of readers to understand the hook, please replace "both" or "both species" with "both birds". —Patrug (talk) 20:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

I replaced "both" and "both species" with "both birds". Gulumeemee (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)