Template:Did you know nominations/Butterly House

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 15:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Butterly House

(

)

... that Butterly House (pictured) Toodyay, Western Australia is at town lot 1?

alt1 ... that Butterly House (pictured), though a residential dwelling, was used as a bank for about 10 years?

Withdraw alt1 as I like alt2 better, for reasons of submittor.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

alt2 ... that Butterly House (pictured), though a residential dwelling, was used as a bank during the 1890s?

Created by Machyl.Eberle (talk), Dan arndt (talk). Nominated by Gnangarra (talk) at 12:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC).

- Starting review - Prefer Alt1 over original. 2589 characters is good, age of one day is alright. No copyvio problems found using Copyvio Detector. QPQ doesn't need to be done. Can I get an inline reference for "...though a residential dwelling, was used as a bank for 10 years." with a quote from the source. Article needs more inline references to show where the material came from. Can the article be expanded a little more.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

added ref inline, the calculation is mine the article actually says it was bank from 1889 until circa 1897-99. Gnan garra 14:18, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Glad to see ref. Could I get a ref for the second paragraph. Can the article be expanded a little. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Good to Go now. Everything meets DYK requirements.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 23:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

some wonderful editors have been hard at work, its more than ready now. Gnan garra 04:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

I'm afraid I have trouble with ALT1's "about 10 years". Based on what I read of FN2, it seems like the bank would have opened quite late in 1889; if it moved out in early 1897, as a possibility based on FN2, it could have been there as few as seven years and a few months, though I'm guessing that FN1 was added to affirm 1898 (the PDF was taking forever to download, so this is AGF on my part), which makes it unlikely to be even a full nine years. I'd like to suggest that the hook be made less specific; maybe "most of a decade" would cover the possibilities well enough? BlueMoonset (talk) 04:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

the joys of watching a new article expand, sourcing improves and dates get more specific I've created alt2 same basic info Gnan garra 18:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

if this is all ok can some one tag it with {{DYKtick}} please Gnan garra 23:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

All DYK criteria met and ALT2 hook approved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Thankyou Gnan garra 14:24, 17 January 2014 (UTC)