Template:Did you know nominations/CMLL 68th Anniversary Show

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SSTflyer 10:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
The only concern seems to be whether the hook is interesting or not. Rough consensus this is OK

CMLL 68th Anniversary Show[edit]

  • Reviewed: Farida Arriany
  • Comment: My QPQ was originally listed for a 70-article hook that was not passed, but broken up into smaller parts and this QPQ was not used as not all 70 articles were submitted as DYK hooks, so if the bot runs it will call it out.

5x expanded by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 15:05, 7 August 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article has been expanded from 2621 chars to 14731 chars since 19:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC), a 5.62-fold expansion
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 14731 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (5.7% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • Some overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Note to human reviewer: the 70 DYK never got promoted, I used the QPQ for other hooks as well, so it should not be a problem to use it here. If you go that hook you can see it was not promoted.  MPJ-DK  19:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Side note, I think that is the last 70 dyk QPQ I will use, fresh ones going forward. MPJ-DK  19:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  • This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook fact is sourced to two different off-line sources. The article is neutral and the sources are largely in Spanish and unavailable to me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT0: So what? The first time an X was staged at a Y? Wow, I'd never have expected that! EEng 18:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Dude what is with the attitude? Holy crap did you want up on the wrong side of the bed or something? Please compose yourself and let's have an adult conversation. Considering it took them 68 years to hold a cage match at their anniversary show I thought was interesting.  MPJ-DK  20:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Well, since Professional wrestling match types lists "steel cage match" as just one of a bewildering array of gimmick theatrical events...

1 Singles matches
1.1 Variations of singles matches
2 Team matches
2.1 Tag team match
2.2 Tornado tag team match
2.3 Elimination tag team match
3 Winner Takes All match
3.1 List of Winner Takes All matches in WWE
4 Empty Arena match
5 Falls Count Anywhere match
6 Flag match
6.1 Flag matches in WWE
7 Handicap match
8 Iron Man match
9 Lumberjack match
10 Strip matches
10.1 Bra and panties match
10.2 Tuxedo match
10.3 Evening Gown match
11 Substance match
12 Non-wrestling matches
12.1 Arm wrestling match
12.2 Boxing match
12.3 Mixed martial arts match
12.4 Pillow fight
12.5 Sumo match
13 Hardcore-based variations
13.1 Barbed wire steel cage match
13.2 Clockwork Orange House of Fun match
13.3 Fans Bring the Weapons match
13.4 First Blood match
13.5 Last Man Standing match
13.6 No countout match
13.7 No Holds Barred match
13.8 Taipei Deathmatch
13.9 Barbed Wire Massacre
14 Stipulation-based variations
14.1 Elevation X match
14.2 Last Chance match
14.3 Loser Leaves Town match
14.4 Kiss My Foot match
14.5 Luchas de Apuestas
14.6 Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal
15 Location-based variations
15.1 Boiler Room Brawl
15.2 Parking Lot Brawl
15.3 Pig Pen match
15.4 Miracle on 34th Street Fight
15.5 Trick or Street Fight
15.6 Chicago Street Fight
15.7 Belfast Brawl
16 Weapon-based variations
16.1 Crazy 8 match
16.2 Ladder match
16.3 Weapon match
16.4 (Object) on a Pole match
16.5 Strap match
16.6 Straitjacket match
16.7 Tables match
16.8 Table to fall match
16.9 Taped Fist match
17 Enclosure-based variations
17.1 Steel cage match
17.2 Chamber match
17.3 Doomsday Cage match
17.4 Hell in a Cell
17.5 Electrified Cage match
17.6 Elimination Chamber
17.7 Inferno match
17.8 Punjabi Prison match
17.9 Thundercage
17.10 Thunderbowl
17.11 Triple Cage match
17.12 WarGames
17.13 Dixieland match
17.14 Lethal Lockdown
17.15 Xscape match
17.16 Asylum match
18 Container-based variations
18.1 Ambulance match
18.2 Buried Alive match
18.3 Casket match
18.4 Last Ride match
18.5 Stretcher match
19 Multi-competitor match variations
19.1 Basic non-elimination matches
19.2 Championship Scramble
19.3 Basic elimination matches
19.4 Battle Royal
19.5 Gauntlet match
19.6 Series variations
19.7 Three Stages of Hell match
19.8 Beat the Clock challenge match
19.9 Elimination Chase

...why is the first steel cage match anything special? The whole idea of professional wrestling is the constant re-ignition of flagging fan interest with increasingly stupid variations and stunts. Will we also have a DYK on the first "bra-and-panties" match, because it took X years for one of them too? I'm really tired of these silly "firsts". EEng 20:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

  • You want some clicks? Try this:
ALT5 ... that a wrestler lost his mascara at the CMLL 68th Anniversary Show?
(I'm basing this on ALT2, though I can't really see where in the article ALT2 comes from.) EEng 20:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Hmmm could you make your distain for pro wrestling a little more obvious? Really is that what we are reduced to? Such distain for the topic in general? And you are basically suggesting "a wrestler lost his mask" as a more interesting hook?  MPJ-DK  22:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Alt2 is the fact that Mascara Magica lost his mask as a result of the main event, a mask he never wore again. The last part about never wearing it again can easily be added to the aftermath portion as I do have a source for it to support it. I bsically pitched hooks that I know are true and can source even if not in the article currently. Once I get a bead on which hook I will make sure it meets the requirements in the article too.  MPJ-DK  22:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
I admit that I think professional wrestling is utterly stupid (and I suspect that, secretly, you do as well -- please don't answer that) but that's not my concern. Look, if a hook said, "Did you know that the first Academy Award for Special Effects was awarded in 1960?" I'd have the same reaction -- well, some year had to be first, so what are you telling me? In this case, as I said, there are apparently literally scores of these stupid match types, and each of them had to debut somewhere, sometime. I think you'll get lots of clicks for a wrestler losing his mascara. EEng 02:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
So at this point I am going to go ahead and totally ignore you, Doine, finish, kaput. Not catering to your total lack of a respect. If the hook sits forever without being used then that is still better than bending over backwards to that - not worth it to reinforce such behavior.  MPJ-DK  03:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Mine was just one opinion -- others might have a different opinion -- but if that's your decision so be it. I'm sure that as you write other articles you'll come across some with material that makes good hooks. EEng 05:11, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
  • So I would like someone else to have a look at the main hook (already verified) or the different ALTs I have proposed to see which one is the most "Interesting". Preferably someone not showing an active disdain for the subject, thank you.  MPJ-DK  22:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, why did you strike ALT5? EEng 02:46, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Because I don't like it at all.  MPJ-DK  03:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
I have boldly un-struck ALT5 (diff). No reason has been given for its striking, other than a subjective statement of "Because I don't like it at all". No prejudice against re-striking if an objective rationale is provided, such as one based upon the WP:DYKRULES. North America1000 09:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
As much as I disagree about what would be a good hook here, I'm bound to say that it's usually been the practice that the nominator's preference for hooks be given great weight. If MPJ doesn't like ALT5, we should respect that (assuming there are other usable hooks). EEng 18:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  • boring "a wrestler lost his mask" I have been told repeately that this is a boring. misleading, he did not lose any make up. Hook is not in the article and would not appear in that form in the article. That is three rules right there that have had hooks pulled from the queues before. Don't really feel like dealing with that again.  MPJ-DK  12:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I approved the original hook and am going to repeat that approval. The alternative hooks that MPJ-DK suggested were by way of examples as to what could be used but are largely unacceptable at the moment and I have struck them. This pursuit of "interestingness" is becoming a bit over-zealous, IMO. At this show, CMLL used a steel cage event for the first time, a thing they had previously not done in 68 years of anniversary shows. Seems OK to me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)