Template:Did you know nominations/Celebrity Number Six

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Celebrity Number Six

(

)

... that retired model Leticia Sardá had no idea she was the subject of a four-year global search?

Source: Kircher 2024, Matossian 2024

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/KMSU

Created by Theleekycauldron (talk) and Tamzin (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 73 past nominations.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Can you point out where in the article the hook's information is present? I can find sources for the start and end dates, but don't see any definitive statement she was unaware of it the whole time. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

@Mrfoogles: thanks for the review! I've added that bit to the article, sourced to Kircher 2024. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Going to leave this for a 2nd opinion because I'm new; not sure about the rules if parts of the hook are present in different parts of the article. Also would like a double-check of the copyright check (I've done Earwig without Google and googled a few phrases, but I'm not sure if that's all). One thing is that the sentence saying she was unaware isn't actually cited at the end of the sentence as required; it's clear that that is the citation, but per the rules I think it needs to be. Mrfoogles (talk) 17:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
  - I've added the duplicate citation. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 19:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

To answer the question, it is permissible for a hook to be based on facts mentioned in separate parts of the article, the only important thing is that they're all cited with footnotes at the relevant sentences. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

@Mrfoogles: Fixed ping. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, everything seems to be resolved except I'll leave it for a second reviewer to double-check the copyright checking. Mrfoogles (talk) 18:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Actually, approving it: that mostly takes a very long time and I’m reasonably confident the article is not a copyright violation. Mrfoogles (talk) 14:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)