Template:Did you know nominations/Chaac-Camaxtli Region
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 09:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Chaac-Camaxtli Region[edit]
- ... that the Chaac-Camaxtli Region (part pictured) accounts for a large portion of the bright plains found on the equatorial region of Io?
- ALT1:... that the Chaac-Camaxtli Region of Io contains a variety of different surfaces including bright floor material (pictured) probably made up of solid sulfur dioxide?
- Reviewed: Mayabazar
Moved to mainspace by Adamwalsh93 (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 03:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC).
- Links please! Johnbod (talk) 22:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know what you mean by that, but I have run citation bot, and will come up with some more DOIs and arxiv links for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Come on!! Io (moon) for one & I daresay others here. Then Venus etc on your other noms. Please don't waste reviewer's time by putting up hooks with obvious deficiencies. Johnbod (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- OK linked for this one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Come on!! Io (moon) for one & I daresay others here. Then Venus etc on your other noms. Please don't waste reviewer's time by putting up hooks with obvious deficiencies. Johnbod (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know what you mean by that, but I have run citation bot, and will come up with some more DOIs and arxiv links for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This article was moved into mainspace on March 30th and is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain and either of the two hooks could be used as both have inline citations. The article is neutral but "Duplicate detector" seemed unable to access the main source, so I have not considered whether there are any copyright violations. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Links please! Johnbod (talk) 22:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
