Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Choiseul Pigeon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Choiseul Pigeon's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC).

Choiseul Pigeon

[edit]

Choiseul Pigeon

5x expanded by Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk). Self nominated at 08:27, 20 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Article - was 1843 characters before expansion started on 19 April, now 10243 characters of readable prose, so long enough with x5.55 expansion; neutral; at least one inline citation to every paragraph; no copy vios detected using earwig/duplication detector; and assessed as B class, so not a stub.
  • Hook - within length criteria at 187 characters; correctly formatted; correctly cited/supported by ref #2 (page 251 of PDF) in 'Ecology and behaviour' section; and draws attention.
  • QPQ done.

I'm unsure of the license on this picture so will ask Crisco to check it before including an approval tick - everything else is fine. SagaciousPhil - Chat 11:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

It based on a PD image, with hardly any original additions, so it would itself be PD in any case. But the PD Keulemans image is better. FunkMonk (talk) 17:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Those original additions are likely to be copyrightable, and we don't know who Lang is. The Keulemens image is fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:50, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I've dropped a note on Rufous' talk page to ask for the images to be swapped here. SagaciousPhil - Chat 06:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
And switched. Hopefully correctly. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 06:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, image is now PD, so no problems, everything else covered above. Interesting substantial article, which looks ready to go. SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)