Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Choo-tai of Egham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Choo-tai of Egham[edit]

  • Reviewed: Baltic states
  • Comment: Did a random search on the British Newspaper Archive and was surprised at what I found!

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self nominated at 22:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough and long enough, and written in a neutral way with verifiable reliable sources, although I am not a paid member thus I must AGF. QPQ done. Hook is written in a neutral manner, and is very interesting. '''tAD''' (talk) 19:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • "Crufts" had been piped to "Cruft's". I removed the pipe. The official website does not use an apostrophe, and neither does the Wikipedia article. I can't reach the source used in the Choo-tai article, but even if that source erroneously uses the apostrophe, we should do it the correct way. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 08:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Ah, that was deliberate. Prior to The Kennel Club taking over Crufts following the second world war, it had an apostrophe as it was run by the man himself. I can't remember exactly what year they dropped it, but needless to say in 1913, it was there. But I guess it is correct for the present reader as that is how it is written currently. Miyagawa (talk) 10:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)