Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Whitecross

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Chris Whitecross[edit]

ALT1: ... that Canadian Army Lieutenant-General Chris Whitecross has fostered 33 children? Whitecross’s parents had been foster parents, and she and her husband loved kids and wanted to “pay it forward.” Over the years, they took in 33 foster children, most of them babies.

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 00:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC).

  • A full review is to follow, but while the article looks fine so far, only two references are used in the whole article. Would it be better to add maybe one or two more sources? In addition, is there any information about her date of birth? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:48, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Narutolovehinata5. I have expanded the article with a new source and added a lead. Potential new ALT follows - Dumelow (talk) 12:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
ALT2 ... that Lieutenant-General Chris Whitecross has twice been named one of Canada's top 100 most powerful women?
Thanks. Full review to follow, but I think I'll reject ALT2 since it doesn't sound too interesting and doesn't say much about her military career. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:38, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Article was new enough when it was moved to the mainspace, and it meets the length requirements. There are only three references used in the article, but all statements that need to be sourced have those as citations, so that's acceptable. No possible copyright violations or plagiarism detected. Article has no images so no need to worry about licensing. QPQ provided. Both non-rejected hooks are interesting, but I prefer ALT0 because it's the more "hooky" of the two (fostering children, as many as said children are, just doesn't sound as interesting for me as going to a school because of their uniforms). In addition, ALT0 alludes to her military career. This is good to go. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @Narutolovehinata5: Hi, I came by to promote this, but I wonder why ALT1 is not acceptable. We're trying to write hooks that will catch people's attention, not summaries of their careers. IMO ALT0 is very superficial. ALT1 will get tons of clicks. Yoninah (talk) 21:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
I had a classmate like that in high school so maybe I prefered that hook since I could relate to that. In any case, I didn't strike out ALT1 so it could still be promoted if a promoter desired. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)