The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment: Its been a while since I did one of these, wow. Strange plant with an even stranger common name, feel free to come up with an ALT hook using the name because I'm sure you all can come up with something much more interesting using the plant's strange name. I'll try and review something in the upcoming days, thank you in advance to the reviewer!
Created by Ornithoptera (talk). Self-nominated at 06:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC).
I am reviewing. Bruxton (talk) 22:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Overall: New enough, long enough and interesting. Correct inline citations and format. No copyright violations. The photo s good. Hook is verified . QPC is not needed since this is only the 3rd nomination that I can find but it is good that you helped out by reviewing one. Regarding the hook, it is interesting as it is, and I am not in favor of making some overt innuendo. It works now and allows the reader to interpret. Thank you for your contributions, you have written a good spate of articles. Bruxton (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
For transparency's sake I think this is actually my 9th nomination, just the first time for a long while. So I doubt QPQ applies to me anymore! Thank you so much for the kind words and thank you again for your review! Ornithoptera (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
@Ornithoptera: Oh thanks! I was not entering your user name correctly. Bruxton (talk) 01:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
New enough, long enough and interesting. Correct inline citations and format. No copyright violations. The photo s good. Hook is verified . QPC is not needed since this is only the 3rd nomination that I can find but it is good that you helped out by reviewing one. Regarding the hook, it is interesting as it is, and I am not in favor of making some overt innuendo. It works now and allows the reader to interpret. Thank you for your contributions, you have written a good spate of articles. Bruxton (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)