Template:Did you know nominations/DPP v Santana-Bermudez
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
DPP v Santana-Bermudez[edit]
... that the case of DPP v Santana-Bermudez held that an assault can be committed when no positive action has been taken in order to do so?Source: Bailii- ALT1:... in English law, DPP v Santana-Bermudez found that a person lying about sharp items in their pocket when being searched, is liable to be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result? Source: Bailii
- Reviewed: Action Comics 1000
Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 19:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC).
Length, history and reference verified; Earwig detects no possible copyvio. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: Review is incomplete as not all of the criteria have been mentioned. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: OK, since I didn't mention it, the hook is cited within the article. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, I came by to promote this, but think the ALT1 should be written more clearly. We don't really need to spell out the whole case name, do we? Could we write:
- ALT1a: ... that a 2003 English court case ruled that someone who lies about having sharp items in their pocket while being searched can be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result? Yoninah (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Yes, this works better, especially because that way we know what country the case came from. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Daniel Case. Restoring tick per your review. Yoninah (talk) 15:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Yes, this works better, especially because that way we know what country the case came from. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: OK, since I didn't mention it, the hook is cited within the article. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
