Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Daiki Kobayashi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Daiki Kobayashi

Moved to mainspace by Miraclepine (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 51 past nominations.

ミラP@Miraclepine 22:11, 24 August 2024 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Hi Miraclepine! The article is well-written and well-sourced. It was nominated four days after being moved into the mainspace, so it is new enough. Earwig shows it is copyvio free. Personally, I prefer the original hook, which seems more neutral. I think it can be expanded to further highlight the contrast between Kobayashi as a male and Mizushima as a female (because not everyone can read Japanese, and may not be familiar with the gender implications of the names), but the current one is good enough for an approve in my opinion. —Prince of EreborThe Book of Mazarbul 13:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

@Prince of Erebor: I've read the SideM lore and Saki is male. I'll look into it. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
@Miraclepine: Hi Miraclepine! Sorry for not making myself clear. Yes, Mizushima is a male character, who dresses as a female idol, according to the source (as suggested by "女装男子"). However, the current hook does not effectively highlight the contrast that makes this casting choice noteworthy. That was why I proposed to emphasize on Mizushima's portrayal as a "female idol". —Prince of EreborThe Book of Mazarbul 16:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
@Prince of Erebor: Thanks for your clarification. I've fixed the article and added ALT0.5 and ALT1.5 as per your input. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your swift reply and update. I think ALT0.5 is good enough and it would be my first choice. —Prince of EreborThe Book of Mazarbul 15:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)