Template:Did you know nominations/Dan Jack Combs
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 12:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dan Jack Combs[edit]
- ... that after retiring from the Kentucky Supreme Court, Dan Jack Combs was twice arrested on marijuana-related charges and became an advocate for the drug's legalization in the United States?
- ALT1:... that Dan Jack Combs gained national attention by defending a Kentucky couple against the state's sedition law, which was later found to be unconstitutional?
- ALT2:... that Dan Jack Combs' defense of a Kentucky couple on charges of sedition lasted 15 years and resulted in an award of $2 million?
- ALT3:... that Kentucky Supreme Court justice Dan Jack Combs decided to become a lawyer after being accused of public intoxication?
ALT4:... that The Kentucky Post referred to Kentucky Supreme Court justice Dan Jack Combs as "a defender of civil liberties and frequently unpopular people"?ALT5:... that, according to sworn testimony, Kentucky Supreme Court justice Dan Jack Combs regularly used marijuana while a member of the court?- Reviewed: George Fell
- Comment: I have no preference which hook gets used. I just like to give people options! :)
Created by Acdixon (talk). Self-nominated at 19:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC).
- Fascinating piece - a very interesting life. I prefer the original hook to any of the alts. Could you replace the all-caps in the references? ALLCAPS is disfavored in titles in references. I've gone through and done a portion myself, and some minor copyediting as well. Neutralitytalk 04:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed. Unfortunately, the titles come out of Newsbank that way, and it's quicker to just copy-paste them so I can get through the sources to get the article written. Glad you enjoyed the article. I was just working on a few missing Kentucky Supreme Court justice articles; I didn't know what I was getting into either! Acdixon (talk · contribs) 14:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. I have struck some of the hooks for various reasons, and the remaining hooks are satisfactory and have inline citations. The article is neutral and I express no view on copyright issues, not having access to the sources. A colourful character. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
