Template:Did you know nominations/Department of State v. Muñoz

(

)

... that the U.S. Supreme Court held in Department of State v. Muñoz (2024) that a U.S. citizen "does not have a fundamental liberty interest in her noncitizen spouse being admitted to the country"?

ALT1: ... that the U.S. Supreme Court recently decided that the fundamental right to marriage does not give a U.S. citizen a fundamental right to bring her non-citizen spouse to the United States? Source: Bloomberg Law
ALT2: ...that the U.S. Supreme Court case Department of State v. Muñoz (2024) decided that the fundamental right to marry does not give a U.S. citizen a right to challenge her spouse's visa denial? Source: Bloomberg Law
- Reviewed:

Created by SilverLocust (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

SilverLocust 💬 15:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC) (edited 11:24, 28 June 2024 (UTC)).

@SilverLocust: Article is long enough and created a day before DYK nom. Article is well-sourced, presentable, and generally free from copyvio excluding direct quotes from court proceedings. QPQ not needed. Of the hooks, I think ALT2 is the best-worded; all hooks are sourced. The issue I have with this article is the lead. It's too short at the moment; I would recommend adding a couple of sentences giving details on the background of the course. Kimikel (talk) 02:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
@Kimikel: I have expanded the lead. Also note that the quoted opinions are not subject to copyright. SilverLocust 💬 05:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Right I was aware, I just noted it so that if anyone else checked and saw a high copyvio score they would know why. New lead section looks good, this is ready to go. Thank you for your nomination SilverLocust - Kimikel (talk) 13:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)