The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, with good sourcing, and is plagiarism free (earwig, 12%). The hook is good for me. Picture is good and free to use. No QPQ neccessary as this is the nominator's 5th DYK. The next one will need a QPQ doing. Looking forward to seeing it on the front page. Lajmmoore (talk) 11:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)