Template:Did you know nominations/Disappearance of Brian Shaffer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 09:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Disappearance of Brian Shaffer[edit]

  • Reviewed: Operation Fa Ngum
  • Comment: What do you do when one of your favorite DYK topics, articles about notable missing-persons cases timed to significant anniversaries, coincides with another, April Fool's Day? Something like this. I hope this doesn't come across as too flip given the subject, but I felt I should at least try to make it fit in better with the other hooks likely to be on the page that day.

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self-nominated at 06:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC).

  • I'm inclined to agree that it doesn't exactly fit in with the spirit of DYK, and might look out of place among a bunch of comical hooks. But the article appears to be undeniably date relevant. So I'm not sure what should be done with it. Gatoclass (talk) 15:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Nominated after 168 hours of creation, but I am willing to ignore this per its date relevance (10th anniversary of event). Long enough at 12,260 characters. The article is neutrally written and adequately sourced. The copyright violations revealed include a Wikipedia mirror and quotes, both false positives. The hook is interesting, neutral, short enough, and verified to sources in the article. The hook would blend in with other April Fool's hooks just fine, although readers may not expect an actually serious disappearance at first, but I am willing to ignore this concern due to the date relevance. QPQ done. Good to go. SSTflyer 09:04, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I think this is misguided. The link text is clearly designed to be a reference to a genre of jokes, so is inappropriate for a serious theme that has the potential to be personally sensitive for a number of readers. Anyway the relevant date is March 31. It should be put in on March 31 with a serious link text, not on April 1 with a jokey one. --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 17:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Shaffer was last seen just before 2 a.m. on April 1, so it is considered the date of his disappearance. But, if we amend to "tonight", I could be OK with moving it to March 31. But we better make our minds up soon. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I have added this to the March 31 set because I agree with money that this is an inappropriate hook for April Fools. Gatoclass (talk) 09:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)