Template:Did you know nominations/Dispersituberoolithus

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Zanhe (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Dispersituberoolithus[edit]

(

)

... that paleontologists cannot determine whether Dispersituberoolithus, a type of fossil egg, was laid by a bird or a non-avian dinosaur?

ALT1:... that Dispersituberoolithus, a type of fossil egg from Alberta, gets its name from the pattern of scattered nodes on the surface of its shell?
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/George P. Hammond ‎

5x expanded by Ashorocetus (talk). Self-nominated at 15:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC).

Article expansion new enough and large enough. Article referenced, and off line references taken AGF. Is there no was to convert the technical term "dispersituberculate" into a less complex descriptor though? As I am used to reading technical articles I can parse it, but general readers will not be able to.--Kev min § 04:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

OK, I explained it a little bit. Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 03:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Better, the added detail makes the article much more accessible. Article expansion new enough and long enough, article well referenced to offline sources. no policy issues identified. seems good to go.--Kev min § 15:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)