Template:Did you know nominations/Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building
- ... that the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building's main banking hall was later used as the New York City Parking Violations Bureau's quarters? Source: NY Times 1973
- ALT1:... that the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building's main banking hall was described as "the one real asset" of a nearly bankrupt New York City in the 1970s? Source: NY Times 1979
- ALT2:... that when the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building was converted for residential use, the developers commissioned an essay about its architecture and history? Source: NY Times 2018
- ALT3:... that when the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Building was completed, it was the largest bank building in the United States? Source: New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission; Dolkart, Andrew S.; Postal, Matthew A. (2009). Postal, Matthew A. (ed.). Guide to New York City Landmarks (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. p. 31.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Spokane and British Columbia Railway
- Comment: DYKcheck may show an error on this page because a copyright violation was removed before expansion. Unfortunately, there's no free image of the banking hall that I can find.
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC).
- Definitely expanded by more than five times the original prose, long enough, no problems with neutrality or sourcing. Earwig doesn't pick any plagiarism up. One source behind a paywall, but I accept it in good faith. Only thing left would be a QPQ. In my personal opinion, ALT1 and ALT2 are the most interesting options here. Good job! Roniius (talk) 04:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Roniius: Thanks! I appreciate the review and kind words. I've done a QPQ now. epicgenius (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Definitely expanded by more than five times the original prose, long enough, no problems with neutrality or sourcing. Earwig doesn't pick any plagiarism up. One source behind a paywall, but I accept it in good faith. Only thing left would be a QPQ. In my personal opinion, ALT1 and ALT2 are the most interesting options here. Good job! Roniius (talk) 04:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
