Template:Did you know nominations/Emperor's Bible
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Emperor's Bible
- ... that despite its name, the 11th-century Emperor's Bible (miniature pictured) is actually not a Bible? Source: "Codex Caesareus or "The Emperor's Bible" is one of the splendid books of gospels from 11th century Echternach." source
Created by Yakikaki (talk). Self-nominated at 15:06, 17 October 2020 (UTC).
Length | Newness | Cited hook | Interest | Sources | Neutrality | Plagiarism/paraphrase |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
- Length is almost 5000 chars, created on October 17th same day it was nominated. Hook is stated and cited inline in the article. It follows all the rules for WP:DYKHOOK and is "hooky" enough. Article is cited with reliable sources, article is neutral and turnitin has no major complaints. Image is properly sourced, is clear at 100px, with a resolution of 630x819. The copyright notice is valid and is not fair use. Please provide an image ALT alongside the title. Other than that, I think it looks good. Footlessmouse (talk) 21:03, 17 October 2020 (UTC)