Template:Did you know nominations/EuropaChorAkademie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

EuropaChorAkademie[edit]

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 13:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC).

  • This article meets the length and age requirements. Written in dispassionate tone it has appropriate citations wherever needed. A QPQ has been provided. I have checked the English-language article and it checks out for the award-winning part. Most of the sources used are in German and sadly I am not acquainted with the language. AGF on all of them. I have removed the unnecessary tags at the top of the article. Good to Go. --Skr15081997 (talk) 04:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
  • This is not a notable subject yet (see WP:TOOSOON. The sources fail WP:RS and the subject does not me WP:GNG. I strenuously object to this nomination. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
  • This article is currently tagged as being non-notable and is therefore not ready for promotion. I suggest that @Walter Görlitz: resolves the issue by nominating the article at AfD, otherwise the tag should be removed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

I will not nominate it for AfD as it's too soon to do so. The primary editor of the article has indicated that they will work on the content within a month and there's not timeline. Just because this DYK isn't ready doesn't mean that the article must be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:04, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

The article is a translation from German. It was created there in 2010, with two independent sources given, but unfortunately only in the edit summary. It is an organization of two universities, which has made recordings and sung at notable festivals with notable conductors and orchestras, is listed in the German National Library and as a member of the Verband Deutscher Konzert-Chöre (association of German concert choirs). I don't see the notability problem. All this doesn't happen because of a organization's website but because they make good music. There's a review in the article, and Gramophone. I hesitate to expand them because it would give undue weight to the single events. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
  • It appears that the issues raised above have been resolved ([1]) and the article is now good to go. Montanabw(talk) 10:09, 14 May 2017 (UTC)