Template:Did you know nominations/Examining magistrate
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:43, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Examining magistrate[edit]
- ... that de Balzac considered the examining magistrate to be more powerful than the king?
ALT 1: ... that French examining magistrates Renaud Van Ruymbeke and Éric Halphen became well-known for their investigations into political corruption?
5x expanded by Neutrality (talk). Self-nominated at 03:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC).
more than 6 times expanded by nominator within 2 days of nomination, so new enough. At 17k this article is WAY more than long enough. No NPOV issues found, article is written in neutral manner and presents viewpoints from several nationalities. Each paragraph uses inline citations to superior sources. No copyvios detected, either by Earwig (only match was article titles) or by myself. I am approving the main hook, as I find it the most compelling. The hook is within policy (less than 200 chars), in my opinion is interesting to a broad audience, is a neutral statement of fact, and is directly attributable to a source immediately subsequent to its statement within the article body (Gilliéron page 319). QPQ complete. No image to check against. This is deserving and ready for main page exposure. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
