Template:Did you know nominations/Fäbodristning

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 ^talk 20:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Too short

Fäbodristning[edit]

(

)

... that Fäbodristning are text, symbols, runes, figures, initials and similar that has been found in Sweden carved into mountains or tree branches?
Reviewed:Template:Did you know nominations/Wildlife of Chad

Created by BabbaQ (talk). Self nominated at 16:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC), Werldwayd (talk .

Article is only 1122 bytes of prose and short by nearly 400 ch for DYK (minimum required is 1500). Can you pl expand the article further to make it eligible for DYK?.--Nvvchar. 06:12, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Fixed it.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Now substantially expanded. Length, date, and hook reference are in order. No copy vio. Please fix the Orphon tag but it is not a reason for holding DYK tick. Good to go.--Nvvchar. 12:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I removed a completely off-topic section with text copied (without attribution) from our runes article, describing the etymology and history of runes in general with nothing about this particular set of markings. But now it's back down below the minimum length again. Also the orphan tag is still a problem. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Comment - I have removed the credits from User:Ohconfucius and User:Tomas E as I don't think this or that deserves a DYK-credit. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

It looks like the article is derived in large part from a translation of the article in Swedish Wikipedia. Should Swedish Wikipedia be credited on this article's talk page? --Orlady (talk) 19:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
It was nice if Babba to credit me, but I agree mine wasn't a meaningful contribution. -- Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 08:03, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

A talk-page ping about this nomination on November 15 was archived yesterday by BabbaQ without any action here or to the article. I see no reason to keep a too short 1100 prose character nomination open any longer. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)