Template:Did you know nominations/FTC v. Actavis, Inc.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 16:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
FTC v. Actavis, Inc.[edit]
- ... that reverse payment settlements of patent litigations are not immune from antitrust liability in the United States?
Created/expanded by EricChuang676 (talk). Nominated by Anthonysutardja (talk) at 16:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC).
The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like ALT1: ... that United States Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis, Inc. challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry? The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --S.G.(GH) ping! 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Long enough, new enough, neutral enough. Hook sourced. Copyvio check chucks up nothing.--Launchballer 19:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thingg: Why I didn't put a confirmed tick there myself, I wanted a second opinion and BlueMoonset redirected me to Crisco 1492, who has never responded. If you feel it is acceptable as is then you have my full permission.--Launchballer 09:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Long enough, new enough, neutral enough. Hook sourced. Copyvio check chucks up nothing.--Launchballer 19:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Adding a tick should always be done by the reviewer, not by someone else for the reviewer, who may (as noted) have good reasons not to add it. I queried Crisco because he had expressed issues with some conclusions cited to primary sources (the court cases themselves) in a nomination similar to this one, and I thought it would be a good idea to ask him to see whether those issues were present here as well. If Thingg believes the article is ready, then a specific comment stating so is fine. Interpolating a hook in someone else's review really shouldn't be done: if a tick or other icon is missing, the best thing is to query their talk page. In my experience, the icon was deliberately withheld about half the time, and accidentally omitted the other half. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
