The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I'll review this one. Sourcing looks good; the hook is supported by the source (Fascinating article there) and the article more generally appears well sourced. Both image sources check out. Article is long enough, and was converted from a redirect today, so it checks out on newness as well. I like the second hook, but i think it can be shortened a little bit to pack more punch. What about ending it with "to achieve an 'ideological revolution'?"Generalissima (talk) 18:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
No problem, so alt1a is:
... that the introduction of femboys to Myanmar was a tactic to achieve an "ideological revolution"? Frzzl talk; contribs 18:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Looks good, thank you for writing an article on this! Generalissima (talk) 18:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
A femboy After some consideration, I feel this hook might be better as an image hook. If so, the natural option is the one used in the article lede. The hook, after this, addition would read:
... that the introduction of femboys (example pictured) to Myanmar was a tactic to achieve an "ideological revolution"?
Or the same, but using specimen pictured, which is more amusing
Happily, the image given has copyright confirmed by OTRS, so this doesn't need a second review. I'll leave it to the promoter to choose between image hook or not. Frzzl talk; contribs 13:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
