Template:Did you know nominations/Four-horned antelope

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Four-horned antelope[edit]

Four-horned antelope
Four-horned antelope

Improved to Good Article status by Sainsf (talk). Self-nominated at 05:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC).

  • A new GA, hook is cited to an offline source in the "description" section. I see no problems at all - other than should it be "(illustrated)"? anemoneprojectors 15:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • The hook fact may be true, but it is repetitive and not hooky. Yoninah (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • This would make a good hook, although it is not mentioned in the source to which it was cited (I removed the cite):
  • ALT1: ... that the unusual four-horned skull of the four-horned antelope (illustrated) makes it a popular target for trophy hunters? Yoninah (talk) 13:37, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: Thanks! The hook looks good and I just added a source for the claim (thanks for pointing that out). Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Great. New reviewer needed for ALT1. Yoninah (talk) 13:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Approving ALT1 as being interesting and cited inline. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: thank you for the approval on ALT1. However, it does not appear that the original reviewer, @AnemoneProjectors: did a complete review, relying mostly on the GA icon for acceptability to DYK. Would you mind doing a proper review so this can pass? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
  • This is a newly-promoted GA, and is long enough and nominated in time. The illustration is in the public domain, the ALT1 hook fact is cited and the article is neutral. I checked a few of the sources to which I had access and found no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)