Template:Did you know nominations/Frances C. Fairman

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Edge3 (talk) 04:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Frances C. Fairman

(

)

Queen Victoria's dog Spot, by F. C. Fairman

... that artist Frances C. Fairman painted portraits of Queen Victoria's dogs (example pictured) by Royal Command? Source: Pall Mall Gazette 28 October 1911 "She is the only woman painter living who painted Queen Victoria's dogs by command."
- ALT1:~~... that Frances C. Fairman, dog-portrait painter to Queen Victoria, (example pictured) was fined for trying to prevent a Hansom cab driver from whipping his horse?~~ Source: Daily Telegraph and Courier, 28 February 1899 "The horse became restive ... an application of the whip became necessary ... [Fairman] ... ran up, crying, "You brute, leave the horse alone." ... damages at £39".(The rest of this long quote is in the article).

Reviewed: Dreikönigskirche, Dresden

Created by Storye book (talk). Self-nominated at 18:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC).

Substantial article on excellent sources and illustrations, subscription sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed, but I confess that I'd like the less cropped version, - it's not about the dog but her art ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, Gerda. Here is the full composition, then. Storye book (talk) 10:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

thank you, preferred --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Questions raised at WT:DYK Admin please remove Frances C. Fairman from Queue 6 about this nomination. — Maile (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, Maile66 for dealing with this. Please accept my apologies for the extra work it must have caused. I am considering removing the offending section to the article talk page, so that its objector will no longer feel the need to tag it, and maybe the nom could be re-admitted to the DYK approved page if you see fit. I'll try it and see what happens. Storye book (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Update. I have now removed the disputed section to the talk page so that there is no longer a provocative tag on the article, and the objector is happy with this situation. I am now confident that the article should be stable enough to be re-entered on the DYK approved page, if admin agrees to this. My apologies again for the disruption. Maybe I should do a few extra reviews to make up for it, hehe. Storye book (talk) 16:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
fine with me. The sentence about her grave has no citation, - please add one or remove it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for spotting the, Gerda. It had been removed by mistake, and I have now replaced it. Storye book (talk) 21:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)