Template:Did you know nominations/Furcifer tuzetae
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Furcifer tuzetae[edit]
- ... that only a single specimen of the Furcifer tuzetae chameleon has ever been found?
Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 20:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
New enough, interesting hook that is properly sourced in the article. Good to go! Statυs (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
I trimmed out the redundant and repetitive info, and remove some incorrect statements; it is now 1200 B. Sasata (talk) 15:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- I disagree with your decision entirely. Information about the location in Madagascar is neither redundant or incorrect, and is not included anywhere else in the article. "The species" is extremely repetitive, so much that it bores me. It is best to say the name of the species sometimes (e.g. at the start of a paragraph) or I get bored with "the species". Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- No, it was incorrect. The species has only been collected once, yet the article claimed it has two type localities, which is obviously not possible. I changed back a couple of "the species" to relieve your boredom. Sasata (talk) 16:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
It has been over a week, and the article is still too short: no edits have been made to it since Sasata's above on 15 November. An attempt needs to be made to get the article to qualify before the end of this month. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
