Template:Did you know nominations/Further Continuing and Security Assistance Appropriations Act, 2017

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Further Continuing and Security Assistance Appropriations Act, 2017[edit]

(
)

Created by FoCuSandLeArN (talk) and Antony-22 (talk). Nominated by Antony-22 (talk) at 18:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC).

  • This article is new enough and long enough. I wondered whether "expedite" was the right word for the hook, but I see the source uses it, so I daresay its OK. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
  • There is some close paraphrasing that should be rephrased in your own words. Simply adding quote marks to phrases doesn't eliminate the word-by-word and sentence-by-sentence copying:
  • Source: The CR also includes a “technical fix” to a drafting error made in last year’s omnibus spending bill regarding hours-of-service rules for truck drivers. The language clarifies what rules will be in place if the Department of Transportation fails to prove that a proposed change to the rule is beneficial for drivers.
  • Article: Finally, a "technical fix" is included in the bill to a drafting error made in 2015's omnibus spending bill regarding hours-of-service (HOS) rules for truck drivers. The new language specifies which rules would apply when the Department of Transportation "fails to prove that a proposed change to the HOS rule is beneficial for drivers".
  • Yoninah (talk) 00:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Good catch. That was from the section that I didn't write, but I should have checked myself before nominating. I've rewritten the entire section to avoid close paraphrasing. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 23:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you. No close paraphrasing seen. Restoring tick per Cwmhiraeth's review. Yoninah (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Further_Continuing_and_Security_Assistance_Appropriations_Act,_2017&oldid=764444889"