Template:Did you know nominations/Galadriel Stineman

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 22:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Galadriel Stineman[edit]

(
)

Created by The Herald (talk). Self nominated at 16:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC).

  • Newly created and cited (although the citation style is a bit odd). But the article is listed as a stub, and only comes in at 608 characters. There needs to be a minimum of 1500 characters in order to qualify for DYK. Miyagawa (talk) 19:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
How now.? I have expanded it a little. The Herald 12:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
1238 characters. Maybe consider using a word counter before submitting your next try? Also, I only see the Northern Kentucky Magazine discuss her in detail. This needs more reliable in-depth sources about the actress before this can move on. Fuebaey (talk) 14:55, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
How now? I can read 1502 characters excluding table..The Herald : here I am 11:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
  • The Herald, according to DYKcheck (the gold standard in checking DYK article length), the article currently has 1466 prose characters. It still needs some expansion. You'll also need to make sure that the hook fact (parents naming her after Tolkien's Galadriel) is cited at the end of the sentence with that fact per DYK rules; the end of the paragraph is not sufficient. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Ok, it is now just over 1700 characters. Miyagawa (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Miyagawa, the hook is still not cited to DYK standards, and needs to be—that paragraph wasn't even edited in the latest change. Also, I don't see any mention of neutrality or close paraphrasing checks ever having been done, which are needed, and the newly added text is confusing and needs editing (for example, "received her most note for"). BlueMoonset (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Done now. There aren't any more reliable cites for the hook but two (one which I have provided and then this MTV one. Anyway, I am adding both..--The Herald : here I am 05:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
The cite only says that she was "named after an elf" - it needs a second cite to cover the specifics. Miyagawa (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
@Miyagawa: Absolutely not needed. So says cite 3 of the article...The Herald : here I am 14:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I've added that cite alongside number 5 following the hook fact. Now for the full review: the size is sufficient, as is creation date. I've done copyvio checks and they come out clear. I think this is now good to go. Miyagawa (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Galadriel_Stineman&oldid=1017345231"