Template:Did you know nominations/Galaxy 4

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Galaxy 4

(

)

William Hartnell

... that the gender of the villains in Galaxy 4 was switched to female partly due to the women's liberation movement? Source: Wright 2017, p. 21; Walker 1994, p. 11
- ALT1: ... that the end of the third episode of Galaxy 4 was described as "nightmare food and could raise trouble among feminists as well as psychiatrists"? Source: Wright 2017, p. 37
- ALT2: ... that William Hartnell's (pictured) role on Doctor Who was threatened if he did not follow the script for Galaxy 4? Source: Wright 2017, p. 29
- ALT3: ... that Galaxy 4 shows two conflicting races—one beautiful and one ugly—and flips convention by making the beautiful race evil? Source: Wright 2017, pp. 20–21
- ALT4: ... that a former schoolteacher was commissioned to write a serial of Doctor Who after submitting an unsolicited story idea? Source: Wright 2017, p. 20
- ALT5: ... that recording of Galaxy 4 cost less than £10,000? Source: Howe, Walker & Stammers 1994, pp. 204–206
- Reviewed: List of awards and nominations received by Succession
- Comment: Image with ALT2 only.

Improved to Good Article status by Rhain (talk). Self-nominated at 08:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Galaxy 4; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Approve ALT0, ALT1, ALT3. I found the rest of the proposed hooks uninteresting, I'm afraid. AGF on offline sources. My favorite is ALT1. BorgQueen (talk) 11:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)